Exodus 11 -
The Death of the Firstborn, pt. 1,
by Arthur W. Pink (1886-1952)
1
And the Lord said unto Moses, “Yet will I bring one plague more upon Pharaoh,
and upon Egypt; afterwards he will let you go hence: when he shall let you go, he
shall surely thrust you out hence altogether.
2
Speak now in the ears of the
people, and let every man borrow of his neighbour, and every woman of her
neighbour, jewels of silver, and jewels of gold.”
3
And the Lord gave the people
favour in the sight of the Egyptians. Moreover the man Moses was very great in
the land of Egypt, in the sight of Pharaoh’s servants, and in the sight of the
people.
4
And Moses said, “Thus saith the Lord, ‘About midnight will I go out into the
midst of Egypt:
5
And all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the
firstborn of Pharaoh that sitteth upon his throne, even unto the firstborn of the
maidservant that [is] behind the mill; and all the firstborn of beasts.
6
And there
shall be a great cry throughout all the land of Egypt, such as there was none like
it, nor shall be like it any more.
7
But against any of the children of Israel shall not
a dog move his tongue, against man or beast: that ye may know how that the Lord
doth put a difference between the Egyptians and Israel.’
8
And all these thy
servants shall come down unto me, and bow down themselves unto me, saying,
‘Get thee out, and all the people that follow thee’: and after that I will go out.”
And he went out from Pharaoh in a great anger.
9
And the Lord said unto Moses, “Pharaoh shall not hearken unto you; that my
wonders may be multiplied in the land of Egypt.”
10
And Moses and Aaron did all
these wonders before Pharaoh: and the Lord hardened Pharaoh’s heart, so that he
would not let the children of Israel go out of his land. (AV)
The contest between Pharaoh and Jehovah was almost ended. Abundant
opportunity had been given the king to repent him of his wicked defiance. Warning
after warning and plague after plague had been sent. But Egypt’s ruler still
“hardened his heart”. One more judgment was appointed, the heaviest of them all,
and then not only would Pharaoh let the people go, but he would thrust them out.
Then would be clearly shown the folly of fighting against God. Then would be fully
demonstrated the uselessness of resisting Jehovah. Then would be made manifest
the impotence of the creature and the omnipotence of the Most High. “There are
many devices in a man’s heart; nevertheless the counsel of the Lord, that shall
stand” (Proverbs 19:21). “For the Lord of hosts hath purposed, and who shall
disannul it? And His hand is stretched out, and who shall turn it back?” (Isaiah
14:27). No matter though it be the king of the most powerful empire upon earth,
“Those that walk in pride God is able to abase” (Daniel 4:21). Pharaoh might ask
in haughty defiance, “Who is the Lord, that I should obey His voice to let Israel
go?” He might blatantly declare, “I know not the Lord, neither will I let Israel go”
(Ex. 5:2). But now the time had almost arrived when he would be glad to get rid of
that people whose God had so sorely troubled him and his land. As well might a
worm seek to resist the tread of an elephant as for the creature to successfully defy
the Almighty. God can grind to powder the hardest heart, and bring down to the
dust the haughtiest spirit.
“And the Lord said unto Moses, ‘Yet will I bring one plague more upon Pharaoh,
and upon Egypt; afterwards he will let you go hence; when he shall let you go, he
shall surely thrust you out hence altogether’” (vs. 1). “One plague more”. The
severest of them all was this, directed as it was against “the chief of their strength”
(Psalm 78:51). A mightier king than Pharaoh would visit the land of Egypt that
night. The “king of terrors” would lay his unsparing hand upon the firstborn. And
with all their wisdom and learning Pharaoh and his people would be helpless. The
magicians were of no avail in such an emergency. There was no withstanding the
Angel of Death! Neither wealth nor science could provide deliverance. Those in the
palace were not one whit more secure than the occupants of the humblest cottage.
Longsuffering God had surely shown Himself, but now His holy anger was to burst
forth with irresistible might, and bitter and widespread would be the resulting
lamentations.
“Speak now in the ears of the people, and let every man borrow of his neighbor,
and every woman of her neighbor, jewels of silver, and jewels of gold” (vs. 2).
This and the verse that follows are to be regarded as a parenthesis. The night on
which the first-born were slain came between the fourteenth and fifteenth days of
the month Nisan. And yet in Ex. 12:3 we find the Lord telling Moses to instruct
Israel to take them every man a lamb on the tenth day of the month. Similarly, here
in Exodus, the body of the chapter is concerned with what took place on the
Passover night, verses 2 and 3 coming in parenthetically as a brief notice of what
had happened previously.
That which is recorded in verse 2 has been seized upon by enemies of God’s truth
and made the ground of an ethical objection. The word “borrow” implies that the
article should later be returned. But there was no thought of the Israelites giving
back these “jewels” to the Egyptians. From this it is argued that God was teaching
His people to practice deception and dishonesty. But all ground for such an
objection is at once swept away if the Hebrew word here translated “borrow” be
rendered correctly. The Hebrew word is “Sha´al”. It occurs 168 times in the Old
Testament, and 162 times it is translated “ask, beg or require”. The Septuagint (the
Greek translation of the O.T. f.) gives “aites” (ask). Jeromes’ Latin version renders it
by “postulabit” (ask, request). The German translation by Luther reads “Fordern”
(demand). The mistake has been corrected by the English Revisers, who give “ask”
rather than “borrow”. While the substitution of “ask” for “borrow” removes all
ground for the infidel’s objection that Israel were guilty of a fraudulent transaction,
there is still a difficulty remaining — felt by many a devout mind. Why should the
Lord bid His people “ask” for anything from their enemies? In receiving from the
Egyptians, they were but taking what was their own. For long years had the
Hebrews toiled in the brick-kilns. Fully, then, had they earned what they now asked
for. Lawfully were they entitled to these jewels. Yet we believe that the real, more
satisfactory answer, lies deeper than this. Everything here has a profound typical
meaning. The world is greatly indebted to the presence of God’s people in it. Much,
very much, of the benevolence practiced by the unregenerate is the outcome of this.
Our charitable institutions, our agencies for relieving suffering, are really
byproducts of Christianity: hospitals, and poor-houses are unknown in lands where
the light of the Gospel has not shone. When, then, God took His people out of
Egypt, He made its inhabitants feel the resultant loss. In like manner when the
saints are all raptured at the descent of Christ into the air, the world will probably
be made to feel that all true blessing and enlightenment has departed from it.
“And the Lord gave the people favor in the sight of the Egyptians” (11:3). This
was the fulfillment of the promise made by the Lord to Moses at the burning bush:
“And I will give this people favor in the sight of the Egyptians: and it shall come
to pass, that, when ye go, ye shall not go empty” (3:21). And it was also the
fulfillment of one of the promises which Jehovah made to Abraham four hundred
years earlier: “And also that nation, whom they shall serve will I judge: and
afterward shall they come out with great substance” (Genesis 15:14).
This is very blessed. No word of God can fail. For many long years the Hebrews
had been a nation of slaves, and as they toiled in the brick-kilns there were no
outward signs that they were likely to leave Egypt “with great substance”. But the
people of God are not to walk by sight, but by faith. How this fulfillment of God’s
ancient promise to Abraham should show the certainty of Him making good all His
promises to us! “And the Lord gave the people favor in the sight of the Egyptians”
(11:3). Herein Jehovah manifested His absolute sovereignty. From the natural
standpoint there was every reason why the Egyptians should hate the Israelites
more than ever. Not only were they, as a pastoral people, an “abomination unto the
Egyptians” (Genesis 46:34), but it was the God of the Hebrews who had so severely
plagued them and their land. It was therefore due alone to God’s all-mighty power,
moving upon the hearts of the Egyptians which caused them to now regard His
people with favor. Similar examples are furnished by the cases of Joseph and
Potiphar (Genesis 39:3), Joseph and the prison-keeper (Genesis 39:21), Daniel and
his master (Daniel 1:9) etc. Let us learn from these passages that when we receive
kindness from the hands of the unregenerate it is because God has given us favor in
their sight.
“And Moses said, ‘Thus saith the Lord, “About midnight will I go out into the
midst of Egypt”’” (11:4). Moses was still in the Court. Chapter 11:1-4 should be
read straight on from 10:28, 29. The seeming interval between the two chapters
disappears if we read 11:1 (as the Hebrew fully warrants) “the Lord had said unto
Moses.” God’s servant, then, was still in Pharaoh palace, though the king and his
courtiers were unable to see him because of the “thick darkness” which enveloped
the land of Egypt. If further proof be required for this the 8th verse of our chapter
supplies it, for there we read, “And all these thy servants shall come down unto
me, and bow down themselves unto me, saying, ‘Get thee out, and all the people
that follow me: and after that I will go out. And he went out from Pharaoh in a
great anger’”. The fourteenth day of Nisan had arrived, and after delivering the
Divine ultimatum, Moses left forever the palace of the Pharaohs’. “And Moses said,
‘Thus saith the Lord, “About midnight will I go out into the midst of Egypt: And
all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that
sitteth upon his throne, even unto the firstborn of the maidservant that is behind
the mill; and all the firstborn of beasts. And there shall be a great cry throughout
all the land of Egypt, such as there was none like it, nor shall be like it
anymore”’” (11:4-6).
How this reminds us of that solemn word in Romans 11:22, “Behold therefore the
goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee,
goodness!” In exempting His own people from this heavy stroke of judgment we
behold the “goodness” of the Lord; in the slaying of all the firstborn of the
Egyptians we see His “severity”. But why, it may be asked, should the “firstborn”
be destroyed? At least a twofold answer may be returned to this. It commonly
happens that in the governmental dealings of God, the sins of the fathers are visited
upon the children. In the second place, Romans 9:22 teaches us that the “vessels of
wrath” are made by God for the express purpose of showing His wrath and making
known His power. The slaying of the children rather than their parents served to
accomplish this the more manifestly. Again, the death of the first born was a
representative judicial infliction. It spoke of the judgment of God coming upon all
that is of the natural man; the firstborn like “the first-fruits” being a sample of all
the rest. But why slay the firstborn of all the Egyptians, when Pharaoh only was
rebellious and defiant? Answer: It is clear from Exodus 14:17 that the rank and file
of the Egyptians were far from being guiltless.
“But against any of the children of Israel shall not a dog move his tongue against
man or beast: that ye may know how that the Lord doth put a difference between
the Egyptians and Israel” (11:7). Marvelous example was this of the absolute
sovereignty of Divine grace. As we shall yet see, the Israelites, equally with the
Egyptians, fully merited the wrath of God. It was not because of any virtue or
excellence in them that the Hebrews were spared. They, too, had sinned and come
short of the glory of God. It was simply according to His own good pleasure that
God made this difference: “For He saith to Moses I will have mercy on whom I
will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion”
(Romans 9:15).
And this was no isolated instance. It was characteristic of the ways of God in every
age. It is the same today. Some are in Christ; many are out of Christ: sovereign grace
alone has made the difference. There can be only one answer to the apostle’s
question “who maketh thee to differ from another?” (1 Corinthians 4:7) — it is
God. It is not because our hearts (by nature) are more tender, more responsive to
the Holy Spirit, than the hearts of unbelievers; it is not that our wills are more
pliable and less stubborn. Nor is it because of any superior mental acumen which
enabled us to see our need of a Savior. No. Grace, distinguishing grace, sovereign
grace, is the discriminating cause. Then let us see to it that we give God all the glory
for it!
“But against any of the children of Israel shall not a dog move his tongue”.
Striking proof was this that every creature is beneath the direct control of the great
Creator! It was nighttime when the Angel of death executed God’s sentence.
Moreover, “thick darkness” shrouded the land. On every side was the weeping and
howling of the Egyptians, as they discovered that their firstborn had been smitten
down. Moreover, there was the movement of the Israelites, as by their hundreds of
thousands they proceeded to leave the land of bondage. There was, then, every
reason why the “dogs” should bark and howl, yea, why they should rush upon the
Hebrews. But not a single dog moved his tongue! An invisible Hand locked their
jaws. Just as Babylon’s lions were rendered harmless by God, when Daniel was cast
into their den, so Egypt’s dogs were stricken dumb when Jehovah’s people set out
for the promised land. What comfort and assurance is there here for the believer to-
day. Not so much as a fly can settle upon you without the Creator’s bidding, any
more than the demons could enter the herd of swine until Christ gave them
permission.
(This study will continue in the next issue.)
---------
Originally published in “Gleanings in Exodus”, in the publication Studies in the
Scrioptures, 1922-1932.
© 1994-2017, Scott Sperling